MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187233121

Venomous Snakes and Snake bite

2000· article· en· W2187233121 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnake bitesOphidiaZoologyBiologyGeographyEnvenomationEcologyVenom
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Incidents of venomous snake bites and their deleterious effects have been well documented in North American newspapers. In one year, worldwide, an estimated 300,000 people are bitten by snakes (Roberts, 1987). The number of deaths per annum attributed to snake bite is estimated at 50,000-100,000 (“Deadly viper, ” 2000). (See Appendix A). Although the total number of bites in Canada and the United States is lower than that of other countries, a number of fatalities resulting from envenomation have occurred. It has been estimated that 8,000 bites from venomous snakes occur each year in the United States (Dart & Gomez, 1996). In August of 1992, Larry Moor of Langley, British Columbia died shortly after a bite from an Egyptian cobra. Of particular interest is the fact that Mr. Moor was dedicated to educating the public about snakes. He was the founder of the B.C. Association of Reptile Owners and used to visit schools to correct children’s misconceptions about snakes and to teach them about their proper handling. (“Cobra bite, ” 1992; “Snake handler,”1992). Expertise in the area of venomous snakes does not ensure protection against a potentially fatal snake bite. More evidence for this comes from the case of Brian Leslie West from Emmitsburg, Maryland. Mr. West instructed local paramedics in the treatment of snake bite. However, in May

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207