MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187309557

Normal patterns on 99mTc-ECD brain SPECT scans in adults.

2000· article· en· W2187309557 on OpenAlexaff
Fumiko Tanaka, Douglass Vines, Tatsuro Tsuchida, Morris Freedman, Masanori Ichise

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear medicineThalamusHippocampusCortex (anatomy)MedicinePsychologyInternal medicineNeuroscienceRadiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Normative ethyl cysteinate dimer (ECD) SPECT data must be available to successfully apply ECD SPECT to clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to determine ECD SPECT scan patterns of healthy adults. METHODS: Forty-eight healthy volunteers (22 men, 26 women; age range, 22-95 y; mean age, 47.6 +/- 19.2 y) underwent high-resolution ECD SPECT. For visual analysis of regional brain ECD uptake, we used a scale of +3 to -3, in which +3 and -3 indicated highest ECD uptake and deficit, respectively. For quantitative analysis, we measured the region-to-cerebellum ratio (R/CE) and the region-to-cerebral cortex ratio (R/CO) for 17 regions (13 cortical, 3 subcortical, and 1 cerebellar). RESULTS: On visual analysis, no subject had a score of -3. All subjects had a score of -2 for the hippocampus and a score of +3 for the medial occipital cortex, except for 2 subjects who had a score of +3 for the striatum and thalamus. A frontal eye field and posterior parieto-occipital junction were identified in 60% of subjects with a score of +1 and 79% of subjects with a score of +2. On quantitative analysis, a significant regional variation (ANOVA, P < 0.0001) was seen in R/CE, ranging from 0.709 (hippocampus) to 1.26 (medial occipital cortex). However, regional right-to-left differences and intersubject variability of R/CE were small (asymmetry index, 3.6% +/- 0.8%; coefficient variation, 6.6% +/- 0.7%). R/CE declined significantly with age in 6 regions, including the anterior and posterior cingulate cortex, superior prefrontal and parietal cortex, striatum, and hippocampus (1.0%-2.0% per decade, P < 0.05), whereas R/CO in the cerebellum increased significantly with age (1.0% per decade, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although regional ECD brain perfusion patterns vary significantly, including variability caused by the age-related effect, intersubject variability is small. Recognition of these normal patterns is important for clinical interpretation of ECD SPECT studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207