Towards optimization of growth via nutrient supply phasing: nitrogen supply phasing increases broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) growth and yield
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A greenhouse experiment on broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica, cvs Windsor and Arcadia) was carried out in order to demonstrate that supplying nitrogen (N) to meet the nitrogen demands of plant growth stages, through N phasing, improves plant growth and yield, as compared to fertilizing at the conventional, optimal, constant N rate. Two broccoli cultivars and two rates of starter nitrogen fertilizer (optimum, 250 mg l(-1) and sub-optimum, 150 mg l(-1)), were combined with three timings of fertigation change. Shifting N rate, at 60% and 75% of the market plant growth cycle significantly increased shoot dry weight and head fresh weight, compared to the constant-N rates treatments (controls). The highest yield and shoot dry weight were obtained when the N-rate was switched from the optimum level (250 mg l(-1)) to the sub-optimum level (150 mg l(-1)) at inflorescence initiation. The nitrogen-to-growth-stage-fitness effect was determined and partitioned into rate effect and phasing effect. The phasing effect was greatest, on both shoot dry weight and head fresh weight, at inflorescence initiation, and subsequently decreased until harvest time. None of the interactions was significant. The results demonstrated the superiority of nitrogen supply phasing over the conventional fixed-rate-supply method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".