MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187356413

Campanian agglutinated foraminifera from the Lomonosov Ridge, IODP Leg 302 (ACEX): implications for Arctic Late Cretacous paleogeography

2012· article· en· W2187356413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eiichi Setoyama, Michael A. Kaminski, Jarosław Tyszka

Bibliographic record

VenueEGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPaleontologyUnconformityCretaceousArcticForaminiferaRidgeOceanographySedimentary rock
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The biotic history of the Eurasian side of the early Arctic Ocean is known from precious few localities, and these are mainly boreholes drilled along the Arctic margins by the petroleum industry. Most of our knowledge on the foraminiferal record of the Late Cretaceous Arctic Ocean comes from studies of the Canadian and North American Arctic margins in the Mackenzie Delta region. In the Eurasian Arctic region, the Upper Cretaceous is represented by a major hiatus in Spitsbergen and the Northern and Eastern Barents Sea. We document the occurrence of agglutinated foraminifera in Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) sediments recovered during the Arctic Coring Expedition (ACEX), IODP Leg 302. One of the primary drilling objectives of Expedition 302 was to penetrate the post-rift sedimentary cover of the Lomonosov Ridge to determine the age of the break-up unconformity observed in seismic sections. This goal was achieved in Hole M0004A, which recovered two cores of Cretaceous sediments beneath the unconformity. Foraminiferal assemblages consist entirely of agglutinated taxa with 29 taxa including three new species. The agglutinated assemblage from the Lomonosov Ridge represents a shallow, probably restricted, brackish environment, and displays some taxonomic affinity to Late Cretaceous assemblages described from the Beaufort-Mackenzie basin. Comparison of the Lomonosov Ridge assemblages with coeval faunas from the southwestern Barents Sea and Western Siberia reveals that there are no species in common with coeval assemblages described from the southwestern Barents Sea or Western Siberia, and only several cosmopolitan species are in common between the later two regions. Therefore, we suggest that the Arctic Ocean was probably isolated from the North Atlantic faunal province during the Late Cretaceous, with very limited or no marine connections between the Arctic, North Atlantic and Western Siberia over the Barents Shelf. In our opinion the Late Cretaceous paleogeographical reconstructions of the Barents Sea area depict marine connections that may not have existed at all or were extremely restricted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGU General Assembly Conference AbstractsSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207