Cognition and Plasma Ratio of Clozapine to <i>N</i>-desmethylclozapine in Patients With Clozapine-Resistant Schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
EDITOR: The report of Tarek K. Rajji et al. (1), published in the June 2015 issue of the Journal, indicated that the plasma ratio of clozapine to N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC) was negatively and specifically associated with working memory function in patients with schizophrenia (N530).Judging by the relatively low mean total score of 53.7 (range 35-73) on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), this appeared to be a group of clozapine-responsive patients (2).We attempted to confirm and extend this finding using available baseline data from a previous randomized controlled trial of patients with clozapine-resistant illness (N554) (3).In this earlier study, patients were required to be treated for at least 12 weeks (median584 weeks) with a stable dose of clozapine ($400 mg/day, unless limited by side effects; me-dian5500 mg/day) prior to testing; as expected, these patients had a much higher mean PANSS total score of 99.5 (range 75-123).Patients were not taking any psychotropic medication except for clozapine.The study included one test of working memory (letter-number sequencing) that was the same and one test that was different (the Brown-Peterson test) from those reported by Rajji et al.We used the same statistical approach, with both tests contributing to a composite assessment of working memory as the dependent variable, and with age, gender, education, total PANSS score, and plasma clozapine/ NDMC ratio as simultaneously entered independent variables.The overall model regressing the composite score on all independent variables showed an R 2 of 19.6, p50.056, yet the clozapine/NDMC contribution was weak: b520.117,p50.384.Separate examination of the two contributing tests also failed to confirm an effect of the clozapine/NDMC ratio.In addition, exploratory analyses failed to detect significant associations between the clozapine/NDMC ratio, cognitive domains from the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (immediate memory, visuospatial/constructional, language, attention, and delayed memory), or verbal fluency.The failure to confirm the findings of Rajji et al. could be due to insensitivity of cognition in seriously ill patients to subtle variation in occupancy of multiple neuroreceptors by clozapine and NDMC.However, the addition of risperidone to clozapine in our study was associated with deterioration in working memory function, suggesting that plasticity in working memory was present at baseline even in these severely ill patients (3).Much larger studies than the two discussed here, in a wide range of patients with clozapine-responsive and with clozapine-resistant forms of illness (2), are needed to draw more definitive conclusions about the cognitive effects of clozapine, NDMC, and the plasma ratio of these two compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".