MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2187701697

The river ice break-up season in Canada: variations in water levels and timing

2010· article· en· W2187701697 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jed A. Simon, Von de Wall, Laurent P. de Rham, Terry D. Prowse

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceClimate changeWater levelNorthern HemisphereFlooding (psychology)ClimatologyHydrology (agriculture)Physical geographyGeographyGeologyOceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The break-up of river ice is an important component of the annual regime of rivers in the Northern Hemisphere and has been identified as a dominant control of annual peak water levels. Notwithstanding the environmental implications, the direct physical action of river ice and associated flooding during break-up can cause extensive damage to hydroelectric and transportation infrastructure resulting in substantial financial costs. With respect to climate change, these effects are expected to be exacerbated in the future. Presented here is a Canada-wide analysis of the trend (Mann-Kendall) in break-up water levels as well as quantitative timing related variables representative of the river ice break-up season. The data were extracted from original water level records supplemented with recent digital data at 136 Water Survey of Canada hydrometric stations and analyzed for the 1969-2006 period. In general, trends in water levels observed at the initiation of break-up (HB), as well as maximum water levels at break-up (HM) show declines ranging from 0.1-0.5 m/decade and 0.1-1.2 m/decade respectively. Simultaneously, the timing of both events has advanced by 1.4-4.7 days/decade for the former and 1.2-5.6 days/decade for the latter. Similarly, the timing of ‘last B date’ (last day of ice effects) has advanced by 1.5-8.6 days/decade. Assessed also are river ice break-up phases including break-up drive (t1), wash (t2) and duration (t3). With the exception of a few sites, the time (days) elapsed between break-up initiation and occurrence of peak water level (t1), shows no trend. In contrast, the majority of sites show an increase in the time elapsed between peak water level occurrence and ‘last B date’ (break-up wash, t2). Similar results are observed for the break-up duration (t3), suggesting that river ice break-up is occurring over a prolonged period of time. Overall, the river ice break-up season has experienced reduced break-up water levels, occurs earlier in the season and over an extended period of time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→