MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187797766 · doi:10.1109/wimob.2015.7347975

Blind deconvolution using compressed sensing in time dispersive MIMO OFDM systems

2015· article· en· W2187797766 on OpenAlexaff
Daniela Valente, Jacek Ilow, Michael Čada

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOAlgorithmOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceCompressed sensingBlind signal separationPrecodingDeconvolutionBasebandSubcarrierQAMMIMO-OFDMChannel (broadcasting)Quadrature amplitude modulationMathematicsTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsBandwidth (computing)Bit error rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a blind algorithm for channel identification and signal separation in MIMO OFDM systems with Nyquist sampling at the baseband. To estimate in time the channel and the input signals using compressed sensing, we exploit the sparsity structure of the matrix type channel impulse responses and the Gaussian characteristics of the transmitted OFDM signals. The matching pursuit sparse algorithm is applied in the channel recovery. First, we develop the method for blind deconvolution in SISO systems where after estimating the channel, a zero-forcing (Z-F) equalizer in the frequency domain recovers the transmitted QAM symbols. Then, we apply the method in the MIMO setting. This is accomplished by decomposing the matrix type convolution representing the mixing process in the MIMO time dispersive channel into systems of equations similar to the SISO case. Specifically, in the MIMO system, the SISO type sparse channel estimation is performed independently and in parallel for every receive antenna. The QAM symbol recovery on spatial streams is performed at every subcarrier using a matrix equivalent to the Z-F equalizer. The good estimation convergence of the method and its resilience in different SNR scenarios is verified through extensive simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207