MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2187800792

Policy Incentives for Tight Gas Exploitation

2011· article· en· W2187800792 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Barrister Shahab Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTight gasIncentiveUnconventional oilTight oilFossil fuelExploitProduction (economics)Natural resource economicsWork (physics)Natural gasInvestment (military)GlobeBusinessEconomicsPetroleum engineeringMarket economyHydraulic fracturingEngineeringPolitical scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent surge in energy demand in the country and progressively increasing supply and demand gap in conventional fossil fuel and limited availability of an alternate, technologically and economically viable, source of energy has induced a sense of urgency to explore/exploit for the unconventional fossil fuel. The unconventional gas (Tight Gas, gas hydrates and coal bed methane) resources have increasingly attracted interest from the major E & P companies especially in the United States and Canada. Tight Gas reserves around the globe have not been untapped to its fullest potential and remain largely understudied since its development is capital intensive and takes unusually long investment recovery period owing, typically, to low rates of production. Minimal work has been done in Pakistan with regards to Tight Gas reservoir development, predominantly, because of absence of investor friendly Tight Gas policy. The author firstly touches upon different types of unconventional gas and then gives a detailed review of its definition problem, which is causing hindrance for policy makers. After giving a brief conceptual over view of Tight Gas, the author then briefly analyses the case study of United States as a success story for enhancement of production of unconventional gas through economic policy incentives. The focal point is then shifted to energy crisis and the importance of exploration and production of natural gas in Pakistan. The author then sheds light on brief description of Tight Gas reservoir potential in Pakistan and then technologies required to undertake different phases of exploration, development and production of a Tight Gas potential to substantiate the fact that policy incentives are required to attract huge investment. This is followed by description of economic aspect of producing from tight unconventional reservoir under the exiting circumstances of Pakistan. The paper will conclude after giving a brief overview of the draft Tight Gas Exploration and Development Policy 2010 (as this has not been approved by the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) on the date on which this paper is being compiled) and then listing down recommendations for the policy makers and all the stake holders to create an environment for successful exploration and exploitation of Tight Gas Reserves in Pakistan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research→French-language works237,207→