Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to report recent changes in the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile associated disease. RECENT FINDINGS: An epidemic of Clostridium difficile associated disease in Quebec was associated with a threefold increase in incidence and a sharp increase in fatalities. Strain typing of C. difficile isolates from the involved hospitals revealed that 82% were of a single strain (NAP1/027). This strain was found to produce greater than 10 times as much toxin A and toxin B as historic isolates and has been identified in many institutions throughout North America and Europe. Frequent nosocomial use of fluoroquinolones may encourage the spread of this strain as it is fluoroquinolone resistant. An increased rate of community-acquired Clostridium difficile-associated disease has also been noted and, in some cases, without prior antibiotic exposure. Although some studies have suggested an increased failure rate of metronidazole in Clostridium difficile associated disease, it remains the recommended first line treatment for uncomplicated cases. Other antibiotics, a toxin binder, probiotic agents and a vaccine are being tested in clinical trials for efficacy in prevention and treatment of Clostridium difficile associated disease. SUMMARY: The recent increase in the incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile associated disease may be related, at least in part, to the emergence of a highly virulent, fluoroquinolone-resistant, NAP1/027 strain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".