MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187911721 · doi:10.1177/089686080602600613

Perioperative Management of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Undergoing Hernia Surgery without the use of Interim Hemodialysis

2006· article· en· W2187911721 on OpenAlexaff
Hemal Shah, Maggie Chu, Joanne M. Bargman

Bibliographic record

VenuePeritoneal Dialysis International · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryPeritoneal dialysisHemodialysisContinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisPerioperativeDialysisKidney diseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To review the feasibility of undertaking elective hernia repair in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients without converting them to hemodialysis. DESIGN: A 10-year retrospective review of prospectively collected data. SETTING: PD unit of a university-based hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients received regular exchanges until the morning of the surgery and remained off dialysis for the first 48 hours postoperatively. After that, PD was gradually reintroduced. The patients on continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) received intermittent PD (IPD) 3 times per week for 10 hours per day for 2 weeks, followed by 5 exchanges of low volume (1-1.5 L) CAPD for 2 weeks, returning to the pre-surgery prescription by 4 weeks. Patients on continuous cycling PD (CCPD) received 1 week of IPD followed by 4 weeks of nocturnal IPD and returned to the original dose in 5 weeks. Between 1 April 1995 and 31 March 2005, 50 consecutive patients were managed by this protocol. Average age was 65 years and 67.7% were males. The original disease was diabetes mellitus (19 patients), hypertension (6), chronic glomerulonephritis (13), polycystic kidney disease (6), and others (6). The types of abdominal hernias included umbilical (25 patients), inguinal (18), incisional (5), and epigastric (2). 42 patients were on CAPD and 8 on CCPD. Average duration of PD prior to development of hernia was 16.4 months. RESULTS: Average pre-surgery creatinine was 673 mumol/L, increasing to 968 mumol/L on IPD. Serum potassium increased from 3.4 to 4.7 mmol/L. No episodes of hyperkalemia were noted. The average total follow-up was 33.4 months. None of the patients had leakage or early hernia recurrence due to early resumption of PD; 13 patients had recurrence of the same hernia after a median 19.9 months; 4 patients had hernias at different sites after an average of 55 months. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this experience, we recommend that PD patients undergoing elective abdominal hernia surgery should continue PD according to the prescribed protocol. Interim hemodialytic support does not appear to be necessary in most patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePeritoneal Dialysis InternationalSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207