Joint Assessment and Monitoring Programme (JAMP) National Comments regarding the Norwegian Data for 2004
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report is part of the Norwegian contribution to the SIME 2007 meeting administrated by OSPAR. JAMP 2005 included the monitoring of contaminants in blue mussel (61), dogwhelk (8), cod (9) and flatfish (12) along the coast of Norway from Oslo to Bergen, Lofoten and Varangerfjord. The results indicated elevated levels of contaminants in the inner Oslofjord (PCBs, mercury and lead in cod; PCBs in blue mussel), and Sørfjord and Hardangerfjord (cadmium, lead, mercury and DDT in blue mussel, and mercury in cod). The results from the remaining stations showed low or moderate levels of contamination in 2005. Considering the whole monitoring period, significant upward trends were found for mercury in cod from the inner Oslofjord and a downward trend was found for lead in blue mussel from Sørfjord/Hardangerfjord. The “Pollution" index was between “marked” and “severe,” as it was in 2004. The “Reference” index was between “slight” and “moderate” as before. Contamination of organotin in blue mussel and imposex in dogwhelk were still apparent, however, there is some indication of downward trends. The results from studies using biological effects methods in cod are discussed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".