MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188404209

Survival and growth of tree seedlings on reclaimed oil sands site in response to fertilizer and ground cover grass species

2013· article· en· W2188404209 on OpenAlexaff
Noabur Rahman, Anthony A. Kimaro, J.J. Schoenau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSeedling growth and survival studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFertilizerAgronomyEnvironmental scienceLand reclamationHordeum vulgareCover cropBiologyPoaceaeEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every year, oil sands mining results in a significant area of degraded land which needs to be reclaimed. In reconstructed mine sites, ground cover is helpful to minimize soil erosion by stabilizing soil. Besides soil erosion control, ground cover may also influence the establishment success of tree seedlings by affecting soil nutrient and moisture availability. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and oats (Avena sativa) are the ground cover species being recommended for oil sands reclamation operations, but interactions of the ground cover with planted tree seedlings are not fully understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different fertilizer rates on survival and growth of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) and white spruce (Picea glauca) tree seedlings planted with two cover crops (barley and oats). To fulfill the objective a greenhouse bioassay experiment and a field experiment were conducted. Under greenhouse conditions, soil moisture significantly increased height, root collar diameter (RCD) and biomass yield of tree seedlings. Fertilizer application significantly increased height and RCD in greenhouse, but not under field conditions. Even without ground cover competition, tree seedlings responded poorly to NPK fertilizer. Furthermore, survival rates of tree seedlings were significantly decreased with increased fertilizer application rates, and no positive growth and yield responses were observed in the field. Vigorous growth of ground cover species with high fertilizer application rates largely controlled survival and growth responses of tree seedlings. Trembling aspen was more sensitive to ground cover competition and negatively affected by barley and oats with added fertilizer, whereas white spruce was unaffected. Therefore, adding fertilizer to these systems appears to be of little benefit to early establishment and growth of tree seedlings as well as for successful reclamation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeedling growth and survival studiesFrench-language works237,207