MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188536141 · doi:10.82308/33389

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of magnetization transfer and T2 relaxation in human white matter pathology

2009· article· en· W2188536141 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ives R. Levesque

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMultiple Sclerosis SocietyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMultiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
KeywordsMagnetization transferMagnetic resonance imagingWhite matterNuclear magnetic resonanceMedicineRelaxation (psychology)PathologyPhysicsRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary aim of this thesis is the reconciliation of two seemingly disparate quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques proposed to characterize human brain white matter (WM) in health and disease. Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging (QMTI) and multi-component analysis of T2 relaxation (QT2) both attempt to quantify myelin content in vivo, but are based on fundamentally different models of WM. QMTI probes the macromolecular component of tissue using a two-pool model of magnetization transfer, while QT2 isolates the water signal from distinct micro-anatomical compartments. The specific objectives were to determine the interrelationship between measurements made with both techniques in the context of potential pathological changes associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), and to apply both to track WM changes in the acute phase of MS lesions. First, simulations were used to evaluate the theoretical sensitivity of each technique to the characteristics of a model of WM that incorporates four pools of magnetization, based on published in vitro measurements. Next, the experimental reproducibility of each technique was investigated, and the impact of certain basic variations in the data acquisition and analysis procedures was evaluated. In the final stage, both methods were applied longitudinally in vivo to assess the dynamic changes that occur in acute, contrast-enhancing lesions of MS. The theoretical results illustrate the sensitivity and limitations of QMTI and QT2 to specific pathology-inspired modifications of WM, and shed new light on the potential specificity of often-neglected QMTI parameters. The reproducibility of both techniques is acceptable for use in repeated clinical measurements, and QMTI has lower variability overall. The importance of corrections for magnetic field inhomogeneity in QMTI is demonstrated, and a simple optimization of the QMTI data acquisition is introduc

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207