MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188701761

Does Nitrogen Influence Host Choice by a Biological Control Insect

2011· article· en· W2188701761 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCruciferWeevilBoraginaceaeCurculionidaeWeedHost (biology)PopulationAgronomyBotanyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of nitrogen as a component of host plant quality for phytophagous insects, with some insects preferring and performing better on hosts of higher nitrogen content. Although some researchers have investigated the role of nitrogen in host species choice by insect pests, there has been little exploration of how nitrogen may influence host choice patterns, and thus risk assessment, for insects used in weed biological control. The root weevil, Mogulones crucifer Pallas (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), was first released in Canada in 1997 against the rangeland weed, houndstongue (Cynoglossum officinale L.) (Boraginaceae). Both pre and post-release investigations have documented non-target attack on closely-related Boraginaceae species, albeit at a lower level than on houndstongue. Field and laboratory studies also have shown how fertilization of houndstongue with nitrogen can increase M. crucifer population size and weevil feeding and oviposition. As a next investigative step, laboratory studies were conducted using houndstongue and the native North American borage species, Hackelia floribunda (Lehm.) I.M.Johnst., to determine how the addition of nitrogen may alter non-target choice by M. crucifer. Two single-choice experiments (adult feeding and oviposition) were conducted using greenhouse grown houndstongue and non-target plants of either low or high nitrogen content. Leaves from individual plants were paired in small containers so that all possible combinations of plant species and nitrogen level were replicated for each experiment. Laboratory-reared female weevils at their ovipositional peak were added to each container and left for 24 hours to feed (1 female) or 48 hours to oviposit (2 females), before data collection. The results showed no effects of either species or nitrogen level on the amount of feeding by weevils. Although there was some oviposition preference shown for high nitrogen houndstongue, overall, the preference for houndstongue was greater than for the non-target species regardless of nitrogen level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiological Control of Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207