MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188712156

Canadian Arctic Plate Reconstructions based on revised geological and geophysical data

2015· article· en· W2188712156 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Trond H. Torsvik, Carmen Gaina

Bibliographic record

VenueEGUGA · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyArcticPaleontologySeafloor spreadingCretaceousNorth American PlatePlate tectonicsOrogenyOceanographyPaleogeneDevonianCanada BasinVolcanismTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a revised rifting and seafloor spreading history around Greenland based on geological and geophysical constraints. Palaeomagnetic data from (i) Neoproterozoic dykes and sills in North America, NW Greenland, Devon and SW Ellesmere (Franklin and Clarence Head), (ii) Early Permian volcanism (Esayoo unit) in Ellesmere and (iii) Cretaceous volcanism and intrusive activity (Isachsen and Strandfjord Formations) in Axel Heiberg and Ellesmere have also been re-evaluated and used to develop a new Canadian Arctic plate model from Silurian to Paleogene times. We have tentatively divided the Canadian Arctic into seven tectonic units, including Pearya, which accreted to the northern sectors of Ellesmere and Axel Heiberg islands as part of the mid-Silurian Caledonide Orogeny. The Canadian Arctic was variable deformed during the Late Devonian Ellesmere and the Tertiary Eurekean events, the latter including c. 250 km of shortening and ultimately amalgamating all the Canadian Arctic units in the Late Eocene. Two of the units, Devon and SW Ellesmere must have been closely tied to NW Greenland (the ‘Greenland Plate’) in order to minimize Palaeocene-Eocene deformation across the Nares Strait during Labrador Sea and Baffin Bay seafloor spreading. We model 100 and 60 km of Late Cretaceous-Eocene transtension/extension in the Lancaster and Jones Sounds but in order to avoid too much continental overlap between Devon and North America (Lancaster Sound) we must include 150 km of pure strike-slip faulting along the Nares Strait.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGUGASame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207