MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2188830411

Answer to Photo Quiz: Adenoviral Pneumonia

2012· article· en· W2188830411 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vijayalakshmi Ananthanarayanan, Jeffrey Mueller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdenovirus infectionFulminantMedicinePneumoniaSepsisImmunologySerotypeCoagulopathyAdenoviridaeViral pneumoniaDisseminated intravascular coagulationRespiratory failureVirologyVirusPathologyInternal medicineBiologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)DiseaseGenetic enhancementCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pneumocytes show enlarged, smudgy nuclei and intranuclear inclusions consistent with an adenovirus cytopathic effect, diagnostically confirmed by immunohistochemistry. The xTAG respiratory virus panel test (Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Inc., Toronto, Canada) showed adenovirus only. Viral culture on bronchioalveolar lavage fluid was also positive for adenovirus (serotype 3). A quantitative PCR demonstrated more than 2 10 6 adenoviral copies per milliliter of blood. Adenovirusinfectioninchildren,militaryrecruits,andimmunocompromised patients is a well-described entity and accounts for at least 5 to 10% of pediatric and 1 to 7% of adult respiratory tractinfections.Themajorityoftheinfectionsareself-limitedand run a benign course. Adenovirus accounts for up to 20% of childhood pneumonia but is relatively uncommon in immunocompetent adults (2, 4, 5). Although fatality due to severe adenovirus infections in neonates, young children, and immunocompromisedindividualsisawell-describedentity,theseeventsarerather unusual in immunocompetent hosts and are mainly subjects of case reports (1). Of the many different types of adenovirus, serotypes 3 and 7 are most often associated with severe infections. Clinically, patients with adenovirus infection may exhibit lobar pulmonary consolidation mimicking a bacterial infection (4). In addition, patients with fulminant adenoviral infection may develop clinical features such as respiratory failure, shock, and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, further complicating the distinction from bacterial sepsis. Thepresentpatientdidnothaveanidentifiablecauseforhis immunodeficiency other than his new-onset diabetes, diagnosedatthetimeofadmission.Veryhighviralloads,aspresent here, have been described to occur in adult stem cell transplant recipients and have been associated with an adverse outcome (3). Although immune alteration in diabetes is a known phenomenon, it is unclear whether diabetes alone could have contributedtotheextremedegreeof“immunodeficiency-like”status in this patient. The moderate respiratory illness in the patient’s son was also documented to be an adenoviral pneumonia (by xTAG respiratory viral testing), but the child recovered completely. Serotyping was not performed on the child’s

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2890.097

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRespiratory viral infections research→French-language works237,207→