Molecular cloning and expression of pulmonary lipid phosphate phosphohydrolases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulmonary lipid phosphate phosphohydrolase (LPP) was shown previously to hydrolyze phosphatidic acid and lysophosphatidic acid in purified rat lung plasma membranes. To better investigate the nature of pulmonary LPP isoforms and their role in the lung, LPPs were cloned by RT-PCR from both adult rat lung and type II cell RNA. The RT-PCR generated LPP1 (849 bp), up to three LPP1 variants, and LPP3 (936 bp) cDNAs. The three LPP1 variants include LPP1a (852 bp) and two novel isoforms, LPP1b (697 bp) and LPP1c (1004 bp). The pulmonary LPP1 and LPP3 isoforms are essentially identical to the previously cloned rat liver and intestinal LPPs, respectively, and the LPP1a isoform has 80% sequence identity to the human homolog. The LPP2 isoform was not detected in lung by RT-PCR. Northern analyses revealed that the mRNAs for LPP1 and LPP3 increase in fetal rat lung in late gestation to day 1 after birth. These mRNAs decrease somewhat during the neonatal period but increase slightly during postnatal development. Expression of LPP1, LPP1a, and LPP3 cDNAs in HEK 293 cells established that they encode functional LPP. In contrast, the novel isoforms LPP1b and LPP1c contain frameshifts that would result in premature termination, producing putative catalytically inactive polypeptides of 30 and 76 amino acids, respectively. Further investigation of the LPP1b isoform revealed that it was present across a variety of tissues, although at lower levels than LPP1/1a. Transient mammalian expression of LPP1b failed to increase phosphatidate phosphohydrolase activity in HEK 293 cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".