MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189091852

Coping strategies, depression, and anxiety among Ontario family medicine residents.

2005· article· en· W2189091852 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lynda Earle, Len Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsThunder Bay Regional Research InstituteThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyMedicineCoping (psychology)Depression (economics)PsychiatryOdds ratioPanic disorderMental healthFamily medicineConfidence intervalPrevalenceClinical psychologyEpidemiologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To assess the current prevalence of depression and anxiety among Ontario family medicine residents, and to describe their coping strategies. DESIGN: Surveys mailed to residents integrated DSM-IV diagnostic criteria and a previously validated Patient Health Questionnaire. SETTING: Ontario family medicine programs from June to August 2002. PARTICIPANTS: Residents entering, advancing in, or graduating from residency programs: approximately 216 yearly for a total of 649 residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Types and frequency of coping skills used by residents; prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders. RESULTS: Response rate for residents entering programs was 46% and for graduating residents was 30% (37% response rate overall). Prevalence of depressive disorders was 20% (13% major depressive disorders, 7% other depressive syndromes)(odds ratio [OR] 3.4, confidence interval [CI] 2.7 to 7.5, P < .001). Prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder was 12%, and 2% of residents met criteria for panic syndrome (OR 4.3, CI 1.6 to 11.8, P = .002). Rates were similar for men and women. Medical training was commonly identified as a negative influence on the mental health of troubled residents. Residents most often turned to family and friends when they needed help (43.7% of respondents). About 17.3% saw their family doctors, 15.4% counselors, and 7.9% psychiatrists. Some residents (13.4%) used medication to deal with their affective symptoms, 7.1% underwent cognitive-behavioural therapy, and 8.3% required a leave of absence from their programs. More than half (61.8%) indicated recreational use of alcohol and drugs, 1.2% identified use due to addiction, and 5.9% used drugs to help cope with their problems. Four respondents admitted concern that they might commit suicide during residency; a different three had made previous attempts. CONCLUSION: Affective disorders (both depression and anxiety syndromes) are three to four times more common among Ontario family practice residents than in the general population; male and female residents are equally affected. Most residents with these problems report negative effects on their function at work. Medical training is the most commonly identified negative influence on mental health. While residents most often obtain help from family members and friends, many seek professional help.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.893

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutFrench-language works237,207