MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189141157 · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/822/2/59

THE BOLOCAM GALACTIC PLANE SURVEY. XIV. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF MASSIVE STARLESS AND STAR-FORMING CLUMPS

2016· article· en· W2189141157 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Svoboda, Yancy L. Shirley, Cara Battersby, Erik Rosolowsky, Adam Ginsburg, T. P. Ellsworth-Bowers, M. Pestalozzi, Miranda K. Dunham, Neal J. Evans, John Bally, Jason Glenn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalactic planeAstrophysicsStar (game theory)PhysicsStar formationAstronomyGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We sort 4683 molecular clouds between 10° &lt; ℓ &lt; 65° from the Bolocam Galactic Plane Survey based on observational diagnostics of star formation activity: compact 70 μ m sources, mid-IR color-selected YSOs, H 2 O and CH 3 OH masers, and UCH ii regions. We also present a combined NH 3 -derived gas kinetic temperature and H 2 O maser catalog for 1788 clumps from our own GBT 100 m observations and from the literature. We identify a subsample of 2223 (47.5%) starless clump candidates (SCCs), the largest and most robust sample identified from a blind survey to date. Distributions of flux density, flux concentration, solid angle, kinetic temperature, column density, radius, and mass show strong (&gt;1 dex) progressions when sorted by star formation indicator. The median SCC is marginally subvirial ( α ∼ 0.7) with &gt;75% of clumps with known distance being gravitationally bound ( α &lt; 2). These samples show a statistically significant increase in the median clump mass of Δ M ∼ 170–370 M ⊙ from the starless candidates to clumps associated with protostars. This trend could be due to (i) mass growth of the clumps at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>200</mml:mn> <mml:mo>–</mml:mo> <mml:mn>440</mml:mn> </mml:math> M ⊙ Myr −1 for an average freefall 0.8 Myr timescale, (ii) a systematic factor of two increase in dust opacity from starless to protostellar phases, and/or (iii) a variation in the ratio of starless to protostellar clump lifetime that scales as ∼ M −0.4 . By comparing to the observed number of CH 3 OH maser containing clumps, we estimate the phase lifetime of massive ( M &gt; 10 3 M ⊙ ) starless clumps to be 0.37 ± 0.08 Myr ( M /10 3 M ⊙ ) −1 ; the majority ( M &lt; 450 M ⊙ ) have phase lifetimes longer than their average freefall time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207