MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189261974

LA PLÁSTICA NACIONAL, PROPUESTA ARTÍSTICA CON PERSONALIDAD PROPIA EN EL ARTE UNIVERSAL

2000· article· es· W2189261974 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura Romero, Luis Martín Lozano

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta UNAM (2000-2009) · 2000
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Architecture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A PARTIR DEL 6 DE JULIO, ANTIGUO COLEGIO DE SAN ILDEFONSO ALBERGAR  EXPOSICION ARTE MODERNO DE MEXICO, 1900-1950, VALIOSA MUESTRA DEL PATRIMONIO CULTURAL DE NUESTRO PAIS QUE EVIDENCIA MULTIPLES PROPUESTAS ARTISTICAS DE PRIMERA MITAD DEL SIGLO XX. EXPOSICION, QUE ANTERIORMENTE SE EXHIBIO EN MUSEO DE BELLAS ARTES DE MONTREAL Y EN GALERIA NACIONAL DE CANAD , EN OTTAWA, CONSTA DE 320 OBRAS DE 55 ARTISTAS, PROVENIENTES DE COLECCIONES PRIVADAS Y MUSEOS NACIONALES Y EXTRANJEROS, ALGUNAS DE ELLAS SE PRESENTAR N POR PRIMERA VEZ AL PUBLICO MEXICANO. ASI LO INFORMO EN CONFERENCIA DE PRENSA CURADOR DE MUESTRA LUIS MARTIN LOZANO, QUIEN EXPLICO QUE MUESTRA EN MEXICO SER  36 POR CIENTO MAYOR A DE OTTAWA Y QUE OBRAS INEDITAS SON LA COSECHA, DE SATURNINO HERR N; LAS ORQUIDEAS, DE MARIA IZQUIERDO, Y EL HOMBRE EN LLAMAS, DE JOSE CLEMENTE OROZCO. NOVENTA DE PIEZAS SON DE ARTISTAS COMO DIEGO RIVERA, DAVID ALFARO SIQUEIROS, RUFINO TAMAYO, ANGEL Z RRAGA Y CARLOS OROZCO ROMERO, ENTRE OTROS, Y PROVIENEN DE COLECCIONES PARTICULARES DE MEXICO Y EXTRANJERO; 56 PROCEDEN DE CIUDADES DE MADRID, ZURICH, HONOLULU, NUEVA YORK, FILADELFIA, SAN FRANCISCO, WASHINGTON, SAN ANTONIO, PHOENIX, BUFALO, SANTA B RBARA, OTTAWA Y EDMONTON.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaceta UNAM (2000-2009)Same topicHistorical Art and Architecture StudiesFrench-language works237,207