MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189428792 · doi:10.70930/tac/u5r2t165

On actions and strict actions in homological categories

2013· article· en· W2189428792 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Manfred Hartl, Bruno Loiseau

Bibliographic record

VenueTheory and applications of categories · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSubcategoryAction (physics)FunctorPure mathematicsObject (grammar)Equivalence relationDistributive propertyEquivalence (formal languages)Context (archaeology)Class (philosophy)CombinatoricsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let G be an object of a finitely cocomplete homological category C. We study actions of G on objects A of C (defined by Bourn and Janelidze as being algebras over a certain monad T G ), with two objectives: investigating to which extent actions can be described in terms of smaller data, called action cores; and to single out those abstract action cores which extend to actions corresponding to semi-direct products of A and G (in a non-exact setting, not every action does).This amounts to exhibiting a subcategory of the category of the actions of G on objects A which is equivalent with the category of points in C over G, and to describing it in terms of action cores.This notion and its study are based on a preliminary investigation of co-smash products, in which cross-effects of functors in a general categorical context turn out to be a useful tool.The co-smash products also allow us to define higher categorical commutators, different from the ones of Huq, which are not generally expressible in terms of nested binary ones.We use strict action cores to show that any normal subobject of an object E (i.e., the equivalence class of 0 for some equivalence relation on E in C) admits a strict conjugation action of E. If C is semi-abelian, we show that for subobjects X, Y of some object A, X is proper in the supremum of X and Y if and only if X is stable under the restriction to Y of the conjugation action of A on itself.This also amounts to an alternative proof of Bourn and Janelidze's category equivalence between points over G in C and actions of G in the semi-abelian context.Finally, we show that the two axioms of an algebra which characterize G-actions are equivalent with three others ones, in terms of action cores.These axioms are commutative squares involving only co-smash products.Two of them are associativity type conditions which generalize the usual properties of an action of one group on another, while the third is kind of a higher coherence condition which is a consequence of the other two in the category of groups, but probably not in general.As an application, we characterize abelian action cores, that is, action cores corresponding to Beck modules; here also the coherence condition follows from the others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheory and applications of categoriesSame topicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207