MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2189571558 · doi:10.2527/2002.803553x

Impacts on conceptus survival in a commercial swine herd

2002· article· en· W2189571558 on OpenAlexaff
K. A. Vonnahme, Matthew E. Wilson, G. R. Foxcroft, Stephen P. Ford

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConceptusHerdUterine hornsAnimal scienceLimitingBiologyOvulationGestationAndrologyPregnancyUterusEndocrinologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An estimated 30 to 40% of potential piglets are lost before farrowing in U.S. or European pig breeds. Because these studies were conducted in limited numbers of university research herds, we decided to characterize the timing, pattern, and extent of conceptus loss in a commercial swine herd in Iowa (Pig Improvement Company; Camborough Line). Sows (parities 2 to 14) were slaughtered on d 25 (n = 83), 36 (n = 78), or 44 (n = 83) of gestation. These days coincide with periods before, during, and after uterine capacity becomes limiting to conceptus survival. At slaughter, numbers of corpora lutea (CL) and uterine horn length were determined, and conceptuses were removed and evaluated. Uterine horn length and CL number did not differ among these days of gestation, averaging 217 cm and 26.6 CL, respectively. In contrast, numbers of conceptuses decreased (P < 0.05) from 15.8 on d 25 to 12.9 on d 36, then remained relatively constant through d 44 (12.1). Thus, conceptus survival averaged 60.2% on d 25, 50.1% on d 36, and 46.3% on d 44, based on numbers of CL present. There was a positive correlation (P < 0.001; r = 0.50) between numbers of viable conceptuses on d 25 and ovulation rate, but this association was completely lost by d 36 (P > 0.10) when uterine capacity becomes limiting. In agreement with this premise, uterine horn length and conceptus number were not associated on d 25 but exhibited positive correlations (P < 0.05) on d 36 (r = 0.36) and d 44 (r = 0.40). On all 3 d examined, the numbers of viable conceptuses were not associated with fetal weight but were negatively correlated (P < 0.05) with placental weight. Compared with the commonly reported values for ovulation rate and percentage conceptus loss in university research herds, values from these production animals were extremely high. Data suggest that throughout this period, larger litters were associated with conceptuses exhibiting small placentae. These data lend support to the concept that increased placental efficiency (fetal weight/placental weight) may contribute to increased litter size in the pig.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207