Surrogate Endpoints for Optimal Therapeutic Response to UDCA in Primary Biliary Cholangitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the standard treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), as it can delay histological progression, improve long-term outcome and is extremely safe and well tolerated. However, UDCA is not always sufficient and the prognosis of patients inadequately responding to treatment is worse compared with the general population. Reliable identification of so-called non-responders is of key importance, not only for selecting patients who could benefit from additional, second-line therapy, but also for identifying those individuals who are at low risk of developing end-stage disease and in whom UDCA mono-therapy can be safely continued. Several laboratory surrogate endpoints for the long-term response to UDCA have been proposed, including the Barcelona, Paris, Toronto and Rotterdam criteria. All these criteria have limitations and the superiority of one over the other has not been firmly established. KEY MESSAGES: Recently the Global PBC Study Group developed a new prognostic tool by studying a large, representative and multinational cohort of 4,119 UDCA-treated patients. In a random sample of 2,488 cases, a risk score--the GLOBE score--was developed, predictive of transplantation-free survival. This risk score comprises age, and bilirubin, albumin, alkaline phosphatase and platelet count obtained after 1 year therapy, and has a performance (C statistic 0.81, 95% CI 0.79-0.83) that is markedly better than that of previously proposed response criteria. Comparable performance was found in an independent validation cohort of 1,631 cases (C statistic 0.82, 95% CI 0.79-0.84). A web app will allow the easy use of the score in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".