Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common chronic disorder, affecting 10 -30% of populations. AR has significant morbidity and expense. AR patients treat themselves with over-the-counter medications. However the usual H1 antihistamines are often inadequate. Intranasal corticosteroids effectively diminish AR symptoms. Beclomethasonedipropionate (BDP) was reported to effectively treat adults and children with AR. BDP was a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI). Subsequently BDP appeared in an aqueous format. Some patients preferred the dryer sensation of pMDI to aqueous formulations. The protocol of Montréal, removed CFC devices from medical practice. The remaining intranasal steroids were in aqueous format. Many patients did not like the sensory perceptions using liquids intranasal. They were unlikely to be compliant. BDP hydrofluoroalkanepMDI (BDP HFA) was developed. AREAS COVERED: The need of active treatment of AR will be reviewed. Chemistry, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BDP HFA will be presented. Clinical efficacy studies and safety data which led to the approval of BDP for use in adults and children will be reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: BDP HFA is an option to treat AR, demonstrating a favorable therapeutic index in large double-blind placebo-controlled studies. BDP HFA appeals to select AR patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".