Legal Consideration of Recognizing Dual Nationality in China/ VISANT SUR LA REFLECTION DE LOI DE LA DOUBLE NATIONALITES APPROUVEES PAR LA CHINE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Currently, China adopts the principle of non-recognition of dual nationality. However, with the continuous development of society, and increasingly frequent international cooperation and exchanges, Chinese emigrants abroad are crying for state to recognize dual nationality system. And also, the issue of dual nationality has triggered a fierce debate in China. Under new situation in China, limited or targeted recognizing dual nationality meets the requirements of the law and applies theory to practice. China should make appropriate adaptations to the nationality policy so as to meet the demands of current economic and social development better. Key words: Dual nationality; Nationality law; Reciprocal principle; Overseas Chinese Resume Actuellement, la loi de la naturalisation n'approuve pas la double nationalites. Cependant, avec le developpement sans cesse de notre societe, l'augmentation de jour en jour de la collaboration et l'echange de la communication avec l'international, La demande des immigrants qui sont des chinois d'origine pour la reforme d' approuveront de la Double nationalites ne cesse de se croitre, le sujet de la Double Nationalite, ce sujet de la Double nationalite a egalement entrainer des discussions animees. La Chine sous la nouvelle forme, l'approuvement de la double nationalites est limite ou visee, mais ce dernier est conforme aux exigences judicaires et l'application de Ia pratique. La Chine devrait adjuster un peu ses reformes, afin de mieux s'adapter aux besoins de l'ere du developpement de la societe et de l'economie d'actelle. Mots cles: Double nationalites; Loi de Ia naturalisation; Principe egale; Chinois d'etranger According to Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China, the People's Republic of China does not recognize dual nationality for any Chinese national. Under this section, overseas Chinese who has acquired foreign nationality shall automatically lose Chinese nationality. With this limitation, there has always been a good deal of reaction to it both at home and abroad. The second Session of the Ninth CPPCC introduced a proposal (No. 2172 project) about revoking the rule of not recognizing dual nationality for any Chinese national in 1999. After that, overseas Chinese in New Zealand presented a petition of 'We Are Eagerly Looking Forward to Amending Nationality Laws of Our Motherland and Recognizing Dual Nationality as Quickly as Possible', to Luo Haocai, former vice-president of CPPCC, when he visiting Singapore; overseas Chinese in European Union also submitted a letter to Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao during his visiting of EU in 2004, about suggestion of amending nationality laws and recognizing dual nationality, in which, the common desire of vast number of overseas Chinese for dual nationality was illustrated by voluminous facts and generous sentiments (Shang, 2008). All these may reflect the dual nationality has become a international hot topic, and whether China should recognize dual nationality is an issue for us to ponder over. 1. NATIONALITY AND DUAL NATIONALITY Nationality goes with the country. With the building of the State and the concept of state sovereignty becoming increasingly deep, the national affiliation of the country has made important significance. In the perspective of International Law, the nationality of a natural person refers to not only his or her qualification as a national, but also important relation with International Law (Jennings, 1998). In the perspective of Domestic Law, nationality refers to the legal qualification of a person belonging to a particular country as a national (Wang, 1995). As the country is naturally entitled to its own laws to decide who is its own nationals, therefore, the gaining and losing of nationality in principle belongs to the domestic jurisdiction and remains a domestic issue of a country. More variable with the international concept, each country in its own respective has developed the Nationality Law on different basis. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".