Antibodies to Ganglioside Complexes in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Clinical Correlates, Fine Specificity and Complement Activation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the Schwann cells and neuronal plasma membranes the gangliosides are organized in clusters forming complexes of gangliosides in the microdomains termed lipid rafts. We investigated frequency, clinical correlates, fine specificity and pro-inflammatory properties of antibodies to ganglioside complexes (GSCs) in a Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS) population. In 63 patients with different GBS variants we performed an ELISA for antibodies to Campylobacter Jejuni (C. jejuni), gangliosides and GSCs. We studied the fine specificity of antibodies to GSCs by immunoabsorption study and performed a complement activation assay. Twenty-seven percent of patients had antibodies to GSCs and 71 percent had antibodies either to single gangliosides or to GSCs. Patients with antibodies to GSCs had more frequent involvement of cranial nerves but did not present more frequent antecedent respiratory, gastrointestinal or C. jejuni infection, did not have a preferential demyelinating or primary axonal GBS variant and did not develop greater disability at six months. The absorption study showed in 2 sera that antibodies to the complex GD1a/GD1b did not react with the gangliosides forming the complex or other single gangliosides, suggesting that antibodies to GSCs are targeted to new conformational glycoepitopes different from the ones displayed by the single gangliosides. Antibody anti-GSCs activated the complement more frequently than antibodies to single gangliosides. Complement activation indicates that antibodies to GSCs have high avidity, pro-inflammatory properties and may exert a pathogenic role in GBS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".