Epidermal Expression of Filaggrin/Profilaggrin Is Decreased in Atopic Dermatitis: Reverse Association With Mast Cell Tryptase and IL-6 but Not With Clinical Severity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A decrease in filaggrin expression contributes to the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) and can be modified by inflammatory factors. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation of (pro)filaggrin (filaggrin and profilaggrin) expression with clinical severity in AD and with mast cell (MC) tryptase, chymase, and IL-6. METHODS: Punch biopsies were collected from 17 patients with moderate-to-severe AD and from 10 psoriatic patients. Atopic dermatitis severity was measured using different clinical parameters. (Pro)filaggrin, MC tryptase, chymase, and IL-6 were stained using immunohistochemical, enzymehistochemical, and sequential double-staining methods. RESULTS: (Pro)filaggrin expression was lower in the lesional than in the nonlesional granular layer in AD and was correlated negatively with itch severity but not with other severity parameters. (Pro)filaggrin expression was also decreased in the psoriatic lesions. In AD, (pro)filaggrin expression correlated negatively with the number of tryptase MCs in the nonlesional granular layer and with IL-6 MCs in both the nonlesional and lesional granular layers. CONCLUSION: (Pro)filaggrin expression is decreased in AD and is reversely associated with MC tryptase and IL-6. However, it does not associate with disease severity, and it was also decreased in psoriasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".