MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2192186535 · doi:10.1152/jn.2002.87.6.3006

Integrated Motor Cortical Control of Task-Related Muscles During Pointing in Humans

2002· article· en· W2192186535 on OpenAlexaff
H. Devanne, Leonardo G. Cohen, Nezha Kouchtir-Devanne, Charles Capaday

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurophysiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulationForelimbNeuroscienceMotor cortexPrimary motor cortexStimulationStimulus (psychology)AnatomyMotor controlWristElectromyographyHand musclesPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A large body of compelling but indirect evidence suggests that the motor cortex controls the different forelimb segments as a whole rather than individually. The purpose of this study was to obtain physiological evidence in behaving human subjects on the mode of operation of the primary motor cortex during coordinated movements of the forelimb. We approached this problem by studying a pointing movement involving the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and index finger as follows. Focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure the input-output (I/O) curves-a measure of the corticospinal pathway excitability-of proximal (anterior deltoid, AD, and triceps brachii, TB) and distal muscles (extensor carpi radialis, ECR, and first dorsal interosseus, 1DI) during isolated contraction of one of these muscles or during selective co-activation with other muscles involved in pointing. Compared to an isolated contraction of the ECR, the plateau-level of the ECR sigmoid I/O curve increased markedly during co-activation with the AD while pointing. In contrast, the I/O curve of AD was not influenced by activation of the more distal muscles involved in pointing. Moreover, the 1DI I/O curve was not influenced by activation of the more proximal muscles. Three arguments argue for a cortical site of facilitation of ECR motor potentials. First, ECR motor potentials evoked by a near threshold TMS stimulus were facilitated when the AD and ECR were co-activated during pointing but not those in response to a near threshold anodal electrical stimulus. Second, the ECR H reflex was not found to be task dependent, indicating that the recruitment gain of the ECR alpha-motoneuron pool did not differ between tasks. Finally, in comparison with an isolated ECR contraction, intracortical inhibition tested at the ECR cortical site was decreased during pointing. These results suggest that activation of shoulder, elbow, and wrist muscles involved in pointing appear to involve, at least in part, common motor cortical circuits. In contrast, at least in the pointing task, the motor cortical circuits involved in activation of the 1DI appear to act independently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurophysiologySame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207