Traduire Paradise Lost après Chateaubriand
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article fait suite à la publication d’une nouvelle traduction du Paradis perdu, publiée en 2001. Comment traduire après Chateaubriand, dont la traduction du Paradis perdu (1837) est un chef-d’œuvre ? L’auteur analyse les principes de la traduction de Chateaubriand ; il montre comment elle doit être réinsérée dans le tissu de l’œuvre de Chateaubriand, attire l’attention sur les nombreux emprunts faits au Paradis perdu avant une traduction qui fut tardive, suggère que la traduction résulte de l’élaboration d’une esthétique par une autre : comment Chateaubriand s’en est-il acquitté ? Qu’attend-on aujourd’hui ? L’analyse s’achève sur une comparaison entre quelques traductions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it