Esophagitis-related esophageal shortening in opossum is associated with longitudinal muscle hyperresponsiveness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute intraluminal acid perfusion induces esophageal shortening in humans and opossums. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) hypotension and peristaltic dysfunction occur in patients and animal models of reflux esophagitis. This study examined whether similar shortening and motor dysfunction occur in anesthetized opossums after repeated esophageal acid exposure and whether this is associated with longitudinal muscle (LM) hyperresponsiveness. Manometry used before and after 3 consecutive days of 45-min perfusion with 100 mmol/l HCl or normal saline measured esophageal length and motor responses to induced swallows. LM electrical and mechanical responses were assessed using standard isometric tension and intracellular recording techniques. Compared with controls, repeated acid perfusion induced erosive esophagitis and significant esophageal shortening, associated with enhanced LM responses to carbachol, a significantly depolarized resting membrane potential, and abnormal spike patterns. LES resting pressure and swallow-induced peristalsis were unaffected. In this model of reflux esophagitis, marked persistent esophageal shortening and associated LM hyperresponsiveness occur before significant LES or peristaltic dysfunction, suggesting that esophageal shortening is the earliest motor disorder induced by acid injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".