Investigation of a New Microcapsule Membrane Combining Alginate, Chitosan, Polyethylene Glycol and Poly-L-Lysine for Cell Transplantation Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microencapsulation of living cells may serve as an alternative therapy for patients requiring organ transplants. One of the limiting factors in the progress of such therapy is attaining a biocompatible and mechanically stable polymer. The current study investigates the potential of a novel membrane combining alginate, chitosan, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and poly-L-lysine (PLL) with the objective of proposing a membrane suitable for cell entrapment that may overcome some of the shortcomings of the widely studied alginate-poly-L-lysine-alginate (APA) capsules. The novel microcapsule was formulated using a 1.5% alginate solution coated with 0.05% chitosan, 0.1% PEG and 0.05% poly-L-lysine with a final layer of 0.1% alginate. Microcapsules having a diameter of 450 +/- 30 microm were prepared. Upon citrate treatment, the membrane remained intact and retained its spherical structure. The membrane was able to support liver cell proliferation and the encapsulated cells were capable of secreting proteins. The study demonstrated that the new membrane can be used for cell entrapment. However, further investigations are needed to assess its potential for long term transplantation and usage in the development of bioartificial organs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".