Fulfilling the commitment: the adjustment process of primary family caregivers of nursing home residents, a grounded theory study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prolonged caregiving of older relatives has become common in families as people live longer, often with multiple chronic health problems. Primary family caregivers are characteristically women with a strong attachment to their role. For many who provide high levels of care at considerable personal cost, relinquishing their duty of care is unthinkable. Thus, admitting a relative to a nursing home is a most difficult experience for family caregivers, accompanied by emotional turmoil and a sense of failure. How family caregivers make the adjustment to nursing home caregiving in order to maintain their duty of care, and how nurses might support caregivers were the questions that stimulated this inquiry. -- A grounded theory approach was chosen to study the process of caregiver adjustment. A convenience sample of 10 primary family caregivers of residents who had been in nursing homes in western Newfoundland for5 to 16 months, were interviewed. Constant comparative analysis revealed a basic social process called fulfilling the commitment, which occurred throughout three phases of the caregiving experience. These were home caregiving, admission caregiving and nursing home caregiving. Three adjustments were identified in each phase: taking it on, accelerating responsibility, and reaching an end in the home caregiving phase; finding a place, getting the relative settled, and feeling the loss in the admission phase; and getting used to it, rebuilding life, and coping day to day in the nursing home phase. Dimensions of each adjustment and factors affecting progress were identified. The common factors sustaining and constraining adjustment were: rewards, social support, and emotions. Findings were discussed in relation to pertinent literature, and contributions and limitations of the study were identified. Implications for health care policy, and nursing practice, education and research were proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".