MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2194214829 · doi:10.1094/pdis-11-15-1255-re

Infection and Gene Expression of the Clubroot Pathogen <i>Plasmodiophora brassicae</i> in Resistant and Susceptible Canola Cultivars

2015· article· en· W2194214829 on OpenAlexafffund
Weixin Fei, Jie Feng, Rong Songbai, Stephen E. Strelkov, Zhimou Gao, Sheau‐Fang Hwang

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersState Administration of Foreign Experts AffairsWestern Grains Research FoundationAlberta Crop Industry Development Fund
KeywordsClubrootBiologyCultivarCanolaInoculationPathogenGeneHorticultureGene expressionPlant disease resistanceBotanyMicrobiologyBrassicaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infection by the clubroot pathogen Plasmodiophora brassicae on resistant and susceptible canola cultivars was investigated at various times following inoculation. Primary infection occurred on more than 90% of root hairs in both cultivars at 7 days after inoculation (dai), and thereafter declined to less than 20% at 14 to 35 dai. The amount of primary infection on the two cultivars was similar at each time point. Secondary infections were rare in both cultivars at 5 and 7 dai but became common after 14 dai. At 14 to 28 dai, the level of secondary infection was greater in the resistant cultivar than in the susceptible one. The in planta expression of 12 selected P. brassicae genes was investigated by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. All genes were upregulated at 5 or 7 dai in the resistant cultivar. In the susceptible cultivar, the 12 genes could be classified into three groups according to their expression patterns: 2 genes showed an expression peak at 14 dai, 3 showed two expression peaks at 14 and 35 dai, and the others showed an expression peak at 35 dai. Results from this study will be useful in breeding for resistance and in selecting candidate pathogenicity genes for further studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207