MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2195419964 · doi:10.2307/3660414

[no title]

2004· article· en· W2195419964 on OpenAlexaff
Elspeth H. Brown, Martha A. Sandweiss

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of American History · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegendBattleSpanish Civil WarRhetoricHistoryEphemeraArtVisual cultureNationalismLiteratureContext (archaeology)Art historyVisual artsLawPoliticsAncient historyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Martha A. Sandweiss's Print the Legend is a magnificent work and a definitive synthesis of the nineteenth-century West's photographic visual culture. The book treats several intertwined histories. One thread follows the history of photography as a medium from the daguerreotype era of the 1840s, through the bulky glass-plate era beginning in the late 1850s, to the 1890s, when roll film made “kodakery” a national pastime. Another thread weaves the history of the trans-Mississippi West, beginning with the Mexican-American War, to the great western surveys and the invention of Native Americans as a “vanishing race.” In each of seven tightly argued chapters, Sandweiss looks at public photographs in order to map the cultural work those images performed in the context of their original production and circulation. A key argument concerns photography's uneven success in narrating the hyperbolic story of western expansion. Sandweiss demonstrates, for example, that the unique, literal-minded daguerreotypes of the Mexican-American War were unable to compete with the popular painted panoramas of the antebellum period. In those panoramas, artists selected specific battle moments to narrate using the rhetoric of ethnocentric nationalism. After the Civil War, however, changes in technology made it possible to circulate photographic reproductions through stereo cards, printed albums, government reports, and other media. In those settings, the photograph's contingent meanings could be anchored and narrated by accompanying text. With this shift, it became possible to “print the legend”: not only did the accompanying text (or “legend”) direct the photograph's meaning, the text and image combination of, for example, an Edward S. Curtis photograph could seemingly confirm a preexisting “legend” of a “vanishing” race. Once the photographic image could be mechanically reproduced with a textual anchor, western photographs began to carry stories of the region's symbolic meaning: first, as the site of a young nation's future, rich in expansive spaces and natural resources; then, as America's past, as the photographs began to narrate the ideologically freighted “story of the inevitable and natural decline of its native peoples” (p. 206).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of American HistorySame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207