MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2196692760 · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.09.013

Fracture and dislocation of a glass intraocular lens optic as a complication of neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy: Case report and literature review

2015· review· en· W2196692760 on OpenAlexaff
Harmanjit Singh, Sarah Kwan, Diamond Y. Tam, Nick Mamalis, Kyle MacLean, Iqbal Ike K. Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraocular Surgery and Lenses
Canadian institutionsCredit Valley Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntraocular lensOphthalmologyPosterior CapsulotomyIRIS (biosensor)CapsulotomySurgeryOptometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: An 83-year-old man presented with a 1-year history of blurry vision in his left eye. Bilateral cataract surgery and ciliary sulcus posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation had been performed 11 years earlier. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/60 in the left eye. Slitlamp examination revealed moderate posterior capsule opacification. Neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy was performed and complicated by IOL fracture and immediate dislocation of optic fragments into the anterior chamber. An IOL exchange was performed, and the damaged IOL was removed in 7 pieces. A 3-piece acrylic IOL was suture fixated to the posterior iris. Pathologic analysis showed that the damaged IOL was made of glass supported by a polyimide frame. Twelve months after the IOL exchange, the CDVA was 20/60. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Ahmed is a consultant to Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., and Bausch & Lomb. Dr. Mamalis is a consultant to Anew Optics, Inc., and Medennium, Inc. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cataract & Refractive SurgerySame topicIntraocular Surgery and LensesFrench-language works237,207