MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2196784529 · doi:10.1155/2005/648984

Toll Like Receptors 4 and 2 Expression in the Bronchial Mucosa of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

2005· article· en· W2196784529 on OpenAlex
Hans‐Peter Hauber, Meri K. Tulić, Anne Tsicopoulos, B. Wallaert, Ron Olivenstein, Patrick Daigneault, Qutayba Hamid

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Respiratory Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityChristie (Canada)
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Lung AssociationGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsMedicineCystic fibrosisReceptorTollToll-like receptorPathologyImmunologyInternal medicineInnate immune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a lung disease characterized by chronic infection with Gram-negative bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus. Recently, toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 has been shown to be responsible for the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated immune response. While TLR2 mediates responses driven by bacterial lipoproteins and peptidoglycans from Gram-positive bacteria, LPS derived from P aeruginosa may stimulate the immune response in the airways of patients with CF via activation of TLR4. OBJECTIVES: To investigate TLR4 and TLR2 expression in the bronchial mucosa of patients with CF and normal control subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Endoscopic bronchial biopsies from seven patients with CF and six healthy control subjects were obtained. TLR4 and TLR2 expression was assessed using immmunocytochemistry. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to detect TLR4 messenger RNA in blood cells from patients with CF and to compare TLR4 expression in CF bronchial epithelial cells with non-CF bronchial epithelial cells. RESULTS: In patients with CF, the number of TLR4-positive cells was significantly increased in their submucosa (P<0.05) but significantly reduced in their epithelium compared with control subjects (P<0.05). The majority of TLR4-positive cells were neutrophils. Patients with CF (n=4) and control subjects (n=4) had a similar percentage of TLR4-expressing neutrophils and monocytes/lymphocytes in peripheral blood. CF cells (IB-3) had significantly decreased basal TLR4 messenger RNA expression compared with non-CF cells (Calu-3) (P<0.05). Although there was a trend toward reduced TLR2 expression in the airway epithelium of patients with CF (P=0.07), there was no significant difference in TLR2 expression in the submucosa of patients with CF compared with that of control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Both TLR4 and TLR2 expression in the bronchial epithelium of patients with CF were significantly reduced compared with healthy control subjects. In contrast, the number of TLR4-positive neutrophils in the submucosa of patients with CF was higher than in control subjects. This may suggest that the loss of epithelial TLR expression may contribute to the impaired defense against LPS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it