MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2196814329 · doi:10.1071/rdv28n2ab39

39 FERTILITY POTENTIAL OF FROZEN-THAWED WOOD BISON SEMEN USING EXTENDER WITHOUT EXOGENOUS PROTEIN

2015· article· en· W2196814329 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. X. Yang, Gregory P. Adams, J. M. Palomino, M. Anzar

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtenderSemenSpermAndrologySperm motilityCryopreservationSemen cryopreservationSemen extenderBiologyArtificial inseminationReproductive technologyChemistryAnimal scienceMedicineEmbryoGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cryopreservation of semen free of infectious agents is critical for the recovery and preservation of genetic diversity in Canada’s threatened wood bison populations. Egg yolk is a common constituent of conventional semen extenders, but it raises biosafety concerns related to transmission of infectious agents. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the fertility potential, both in vitro and in vivo, of semen frozen without the use of exogenous protein but with addition of cholesterol loaded cyclodextrin (CLC). Semen was collected by electro ejaculation from 4 wood bison bulls. Fresh sperm total motility and concentration were analysed using a computer-assisted sperm analyzer. Ejaculates with total sperm motility of >60% and a concentration of >200 × 106 sperm mL–1 were selected and pooled among bulls. For the control group, pooled semen was diluted to 50 × 106 sperm mL–1 with conventional extender containing 20% egg yolk and 7% glycerol. For the test group, pooled semen was diluted to 100 × 106 sperm mL–1 in Tris-citric acid buffer and incubated with 2 mg mL–1 CLC for 15 min before 1 : 1 dilution with 14% glycerol extender. Extended semen was placed in 0.5-mL straws, cooled, and frozen. Post-thaw motility analysis was conducted using a computer-assisted sperm analyzer, and the 2 collections with highest post-thaw motility were selected for fertility testing. Heterologous IVF was conducted using bovine oocytes obtained from an abattoir. After 20 to 22 h of in vitro maturation, the cumulus-oocyte complexes were placed into drops with either control or test semen. After 18 h, potential zygotes were denuded and moved to culture media. Cleavage and blastocyst rates were assessed on Day 4 and 8, respectively, from oocyte collection. The fertility potential of the semen was also tested in vivo using synchronized wood bison cows. At 24 h after hCG treatment, bison cows were assigned randomly to 2 groups and inseminated twice, 12 h apart, with frozen-thawed control semen (n = 23) or test semen (n = 23). Pregnancy was assessed 34 to 36 days after insemination by transrectal ultrasonography. Total sperm motility (mean ± standard error of the mean) of fresh semen was 80.2 ± 3.3%. The post-thaw motility was 41.7 ± 2.9% and 44.6 ± 3.3% for control and test semen, respectively. The cleavage rates of bovine oocytes fertilized in vitro with bison semen from the control group (n = 278) and test group (n = 299) were 49.9 ± 2.1% and 41.3 ± 4.5%, respectively, and the blastocyst rates were 17.7 ± 1.7% and 17.3 ± 2.5%, respectively. Pregnancy rates of wood bison artificially inseminated with control and test semen were 39 and 0%, respectively. In conclusion, wood bison semen frozen with CLC (without exogenous protein) resulted in post-thaw motility and in vitro fertility potential comparable to that of conventional egg yolk extender. However, CLC semen failed to fertilize in vivo, perhaps because of disruption of the processes of capacitation. The dichotomy between in vivo and in vitro results was surprising. It may be necessary to exercise caution when using IVF as a tool to assess fertility in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207