MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2197555561 · doi:10.4161/gmic.1.5.13295

'Nodophagy'

2010· article· hu· W2197555561 on OpenAlexaff
Mahendrasingh Ramjeet, Séamus Hussey, Dana J. Philpott, Leonardo H. Travassos

Bibliographic record

VenueGut Microbes · 2010
Typearticle
Languagehu
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsATG16L1AutophagyBiologyNOD2Immune systemCell biologyMajor histocompatibility complexAntigen presentationAcquired immune systemInflammasomeInnate immune systemImmunologyInflammationT cellGeneticsApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autophagy is a homeostatic pathway that processes and recycles damaged organelles and other cytoplasmic contents. While studies have implicated autophagy in the immune response to infection, the understanding of how the autophagic machinery specifically targets intracellular pathogens has remained elusive. Two recent studies have uncovered an autophagy-mediated immune response to bacteria through their detection by Nod receptors. In particular, Nod1 and Nod2 recruit the autophagic protein ATG16L1 to the plasma membrane at the bacterial entry site to promote an autophagy-dependent elimination of bacteria. In addition, Nod2 and ATG16L1 synergize to initiate an adaptive immune response to bacterial invasion by enhancing major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II antigen presentation. These findings link two Crohn disease-associated susceptibility genes and reveal that cells expressing the risk-associated variants of ATG16L1 are defective in autophagy-mediated bacterial handling and antigen presentation. This could lead to bacterial persistence and contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGut MicrobesSame topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207