MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 18974: A Pilot Study of the Effects of Ranolazine on Right Ventricular Structure and Function, Exercise Capacity, and Symptoms in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

2012· article· en· W2197705030 on OpenAlexaff
Sanjiv J. Shah, Michael J. Cuttica, Lauren Beussink‐Nelson, Hamorabi Mkrdichian, Roberto Sarnari, Brandon Benefield, Senthil Selvaraj, Jane E. Dematte, Daniel Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPharmacological Effects and Assays
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRanolazineCardiologyInternal medicinePulmonary hypertensionVentricular functionDiastolic functionBlood pressureDiastole

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Right ventricular (RV) failure is a major cause of death in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). RV ischemia, which is common in PAH, plays a major role in the development of RV failure. We hypothesized that ranolazine, a late Na+ current inhibitor, would be beneficial in patients with PAH by increasing RV perfusion. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 10 patients with World Health Organization (WHO) Group I PAH and symptoms of angina (or anginal equivalent) in an observational, 3-month study of the effects of ranolazine (1000 mg PO BID) in PAH. All patients were on chronic pulmonary vasodilator therapy. At baseline and 3 months, patients underwent functional class assessment, 6-minute walk test, bicycle echocardiography with speckle-tracking for assessment of RV mechanics, right heart catheterization, and adenosine perfusion cardiac MRI. Data was compared at baseline vs. 3-months using paired t-tests. Results: The mean age was 47±13 y, and 80% were female. At baseline, patients had moderate or greater PAH (Table 1) with evidence of RV dysfunction (7/10 patients had reduced RV fractional area change [<0.35], and all patients had septal flattening indicative of RV overload). Ranolazine was well tolerated in 90% of patients (7 patients tolerated the full dose and 2 patients required a dose reduction due to side effects, after which the drug was well tolerated). Ranolazine was discontinued in 1 patient due to a medication interaction. After 3 mo. of ranolazine therapy, symptoms improved, exercise capacity increased, RV size decreased, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) increased (Table 1). There were no changes in invasive hemodynamics, and no major adverse events. Conclusions: Ranolazine is well tolerated and safe in patients with WHO Group I PAH. After 3 mo. of therapy, ranolazine improved RV size and function and resulted in symptomatic improvement. These findings support the development of clinical trials for ranolazine in PAH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicPharmacological Effects and AssaysFrench-language works237,207