MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 14299: The Prognostic Value of Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 7 in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From Irbesartan in Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction (I-PRESERVE) Trial

2015· article· en· W2198403704 on OpenAlexaff
Parul U. Gandhi, Sheryl L. Chow, Thomas S. Rector, Henry Krum, Hanna K. Gaggin, John J.V. McMurray, Michael R. Zile, Michel Komajda, Robert S. McKelvie, Peter E. Carson, James L. Januzzi, Inder S. Anand

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIrbesartanHeart failureEjection fractionInternal medicineCardiologyHazard ratioHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionNatriuretic peptideGDF15BiomarkerEndocrinologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) is a cell cycle arrest biomarker associated with abnormal diastology and prognosis in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). Its role in patients with HFpEF is unknown. Hypothesis: IGFBP7 will be associated with adverse outcomes in HFpEF. Methods: Baseline (BL) IGFBP7 (n=302; placebo=154, irbesartan=148) and 6 month change (Δ; n=293; placebo=147, irbesartan=146) were measured and correlated with clinical data, biomarkers, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the primary outcome of all-cause mortality (ACM) or cardiovascular hospitalization (CVH) in patients from the Irbesartan in HFpEF (I-PRESERVE) Trial; secondary outcomes included HF events. Results: Median BL IGFBP7 concentration was 218 ng/mL, higher than previously seen in patients with HFrEF. BL IGFBP7 was correlated with age (R 2 =0.13; P<0.0001) and other prognostic variables including amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; R 2 =0.22; P<0.0001) and eGFR (R 2 =0.14; P<0.0001). BL IGFBP7 was associated with the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR]=1.06 per 10 ng/mL; P<0.001), ACM (HR=1.08 per 10 ng/mL; P<0.001), and HF events (HR=1.07 per 10 ng/mL; P<0.001; Figure ) and remained significant for all outcomes after adjustment for NT-proBNP and eGFR. After 6 months, IGFBP7 did not change significantly in either treatment group. ΔIGFBP7 was not independently associated with outcomes but was associated with a decrease in eGFR in patients randomized to receive irbesartan (R 2 =0.09; P<0.002). Conclusions: IGFBP7 is associated with adverse outcomes in HFpEF. Further studies are needed to identify the mechanistic link between IGFBP7, renal function, and outcomes in patients with HFpEF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207