Detecting leafy spurge in native grassland using hyperspectral image analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leafy spurge (Euphoria esula L.) is a perennial noxious weed that has been encroaches on the native grassland regions of North America resulting in biological and economic impacts. Leafy spurge growth is most prevalent along river banks and in pasture areas. Due to poor accessibility and the cost and labour associated with data collection, estimates of number and size of leafy spurge infestations is poor. Remote sensing has the ability to cover large areas, providing an alternate means to ground surveys and will allow for the capability to create an accurate baseline of infestations. Airborne hyperspectral data were collected over the two test sites selected on the Blood Reserve in Southern Alberta using a combined Airborne Imaging Spectrometer for different Applications (AISA) Eagle and Hawk sensor systems in July, 2010. This study used advanced analysis tools, including spectral mixture analysis, spectral angle mapper and mixture-tuned matched filter techniques to evaluate the ability to detect leafy spurge patches. The results show that patches of leafy spurge with flowering stem density >40 stems m-2 were identified with 85 % accuracy while identification of lower density stems were less accurate (10 - 40 %). The results are promising with respect to quantifying areas of significant leafy spurge infestation and targeting biological control and potential insect release sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".