MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W219897613 · doi:10.2307/3341647

Neighbourhood Poverty in Canadian Cities

2000· article· en· W219897613 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Abdolmohammad Kazempiur, Shiva S. Halli

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeighbourhood (mathematics)SociologyPovertyEconomic geographyUrban povertyRegional scienceEconomic growthGeographyEconomicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The recent surge of poverty in the industrial nations seems to be accompanied by increasing concentration of the poor in urban space. As a problem distinct from poverty, the spatial concentration of poverty, reflected in the rising number of poor neighbourhoods, has some serious social consequences of its own ranging from concentrating problems such as crime, school drop-out, and teen-pregnancy in few neighbourhoods, and the development of a sub-culture distinct from mainstream culture. Despite its seriousness, however, neighbourhood poverty has not received much attention in Canada. Addressing this gap in the literature, the present article examines the magnitude of the problem in Canada and its changes between 1986 and 1996. The findings of the study clearly indicate that the urban areas in Quebec and the Prairie, Montreal and Winnipeg in particular, are most severely hit by the rise of neighbourhood poverty. Other cities in these areas, along with Toronto, Kingston, Halifax, and St. John's have begun to experience an alarming rise only between 1991 and 1996. Smaller cities in Ontario, along with Victoria in B.C., are the only ones that have witnessed a decline in their neighbourhood poverty rates. The regional variations in the magnitude of the neighbourhood poverty in Canada may indicate, among others, that the economic recessions of the mid-80s and early-90s have affected certain areas more severely than others. Resume: La recente vague de pauvrete qui a deferle dans les pays industrialises semble s'accompagner d'une plus grande concentration de pauvres dans l'espace urbain. Quoique distinct de la pauvrete, la concentration spatiale de cette derniere, qui se traduit en un nombre de plus en plus grand de quartiers pauvres, presente des consequences sociales graves en soi, allant de la criminalite, au decrochage scolaire, a la grossesse chez les adolescentes dans quelques quartiers et au developpement de sous-cultures distinctes des courants dominants. Malgre sa gravite, la pauvrete pauvrete de voisinage n'a pas attire beaucoup d'attention au Canada. Dans l'espoir de combler cette lacune, cet article examine l'ampleur du probleme au Canada ainsi que les changements qui se sont produits entre 1986 et 1996. L'etude demontre clairement que les regions urbaines du Quebec et des Prairies sont les plus touchees par la hausse de la pauvrete de voisinage, tout particulierement Montreal et Winnipeg. D'autres villes dans les memes regions, ainsi que Toronto, Kingston, Halifax et St. John's n'ont remarque une hausse alarmante qu'entre 1991 et 1996. Les villes plus petites en Ontario, tout comme d'ailleurs Victoria, en Colombie-Britannique, sont les seules a avoir vu le taux de pauvrete de voisinage diminuer. Les ecarts regionaux de l'ampleur de la pauvrete de voisinage au Canada peuvent indiquer, entre autres, que les recessions du milieu des annees quatre-vingts et du debut des annees quatre-vingt-dix se sont davantage fait sentir dans certaines regions que d'autres. Introduction In the late 1980s and early 1990s, a new dimension of poverty attracted the attention of researchers in the United States. This new dimension involved neighbourhood poverty, also referred to in the literature as urban concentrated poverty and spatial concentration of poverty. The first attempt to study this dimension of poverty analytically was made by Wilson (1987), furthered by Massey and Eggers (1990), Massey and Denton (1993), and Jargowsky and Jo Bane (1991), among others. The main thrust of these studies was that, during the 1980s and 1990s, poor individuals and families tended increasingly to be concentrated in a few neighbourhoods in each city. This phenomenon, the studies argued, had profound social and cultural consequences for those living in such neighbourhoods as well as for the larger society. One serious consequence of the poor being concentrated in a few areas of a city -- that is, high levels of neighbourhood poverty -- is the massive breakdown of social institutions in such areas (Massey and Eggers, 1990). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of SociologySame topicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesFrench-language works237,207