Tissue-specific sex differences in docosahexaenoic acid and Δ6-desaturase in rats fed a standard chow diet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3) is higher in the blood and tissues of females relative to males, but the underlying mechanism is not clear. The present study examined the expression of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of DHA from short-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in male and female rats (n = 6 for each sex). Rats were maintained on an AIN-93G diet and sacrificed at 14 weeks of age after an overnight fast. Plasma, erythrocytes, liver, heart, and brain were collected for fatty acid composition analysis and the determination of enzyme and transcription factor expression by RT-PCR and immunoblotting. Females had higher DHA concentrations in the total lipids of liver, plasma, erythrocyte, and heart (53%, 75%, 36%, and 25% higher, respectively, compared with males) with no sex differences in brain DHA concentrations. The mRNA content of Δ5-desaturase, Δ6-desaturase, and elongase 2 was 1.0-, 1.4-, and 1.1-fold higher, respectively, in the livers of female rats compared with males, with no differences in the hearts or brains. The protein content of Δ6-desaturase was also higher in females. Higher hepatic mRNA of sterol-regulatory element-binding protein 1-c and estrogen receptor α in the females suggests that lipogenic and estrogen signaling mechanisms are involved. The sex difference in DHA concentration is tissue specific and is associated with higher Δ6-desaturase expression in females relative to males, which appears to be limited to the liver.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".