MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2199741929 · doi:10.1177/112972980700800412

Risk Factors for the Development of Cephalic Arch Stenosis

2007· article· en· W2199741929 on OpenAlex
Arash Jaberi, Deborah Schwartz, Rosa M. Marticorena, Niki Dacouris, Vikramaditya Prabhudesai, Phil McFarlane, Sandra Donnelly

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Vascular Access · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersSiemens USA
KeywordsMedicineCephalic veinFistulaBrachiocephalic arteryBrachiocephalic veinStenosisArteriovenous fistulaSurgeryHemodialysisVeinAortic archInternal medicineCardiologySuperior vena cavaAorta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The creation of a vascular access is necessary in hemodialysis patients, including those with marginal vessels. Upper arm fistulae are attractive due to the ease of creation and of achieving high access flow rates. Cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) can lead to failure of upper arm fistulae and is increasingly identified. We hypothesized that CAS is promoted by high blood flow rates, brachiocephalic fistulae, and an angle of cephalic vein insertion approaching 90 degrees. METHODS: All patients requiring a fistulogram between January 2004 and May 2006 had surveillance fluoroscopy of the central veins. Demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters were collected and the angle of the cephalic vein insertion measured by 3 blinded independent observers. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients had fistulograms and CAS was detected in 18 subjects. Significant differences between the CAS and non-CAS groups were brachiocephalic fistula site (p = 0.046), access flow (mL/min) (p = 0.012), and absence of diabetes (p = 0.03). Univariate predictors of CAS include access flow (per 100 mL/min) (p = 0.042), platelet count (p = 0.031) and calcium-phosphate product (p = 0.026). The relationship of brachiocephalic site and CAS was confounded by access flow [(per 100 mL/min)*brachiocephalic fistula site (p = 0.016)] and fistula age [brachiocephalic fistula site*fistula age (p = 0.017)]. In multivariate analysis, renovascular disease, calcium-phosphate product, platelet count and access flow (per 100 mL/min)*brachiocephalic fistula predicted CAS (p < 0.001, Negelkerke's R-Square = 0.55). The angle of insertion of the cephalic vein was not predictive for CAS. CONCLUSIONS: CAS may be a long-term consequence of high blood flow rates. The interaction of access flow and brachiocephalic fistula supports the hypothesis that high flow through a brachiocephalic fistula promotes CAS. The multiple factors influencing cephalic arch remodeling require further research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it