La sobirania dels pobles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los tres ensayos que componen este libro tienen en comun el examinar, a partir de casos concretos, el significado profundo de conceptos como autonomia, soberania e independencia. Estos conceptos son muy tergiversados e instrumentalizados en los debates politicos actuales, tanto en Europa (referendum en Escocia, consulta en Cataluna) como en America: el caso de Quebec y la compleja problematica de las autonomias indigenas, desde Argentina hasta Canada. Los autores estudian situaciones del Sur invirtiendo, en palabras de Aparicio, «el sentido del flujo hegemonico de conocimientos y aprendizajes » (p. 9). Los capitulos del propio Aparicio y de Breton y Martinez Mauri profundizan en el tema de las relaciones de los pueblos indigenas con estados nacion, mientras que el texto de Marti i Puig analiza el caso singular de Puerto Rico, casi un estado naciones, «asociado» desde hace medio siglo al pais que ejerce la hegemonia en el continente, Estados Unidos. La perspectiva del libro es netamente comparativa, lo que permite superar las generalizaciones a partir de un solo caso que se dan con frecuencia. * * * Index Prologo, Pierre Beaucage Puerto Rico i els Estats Units: quina relacio? Quina autonomia? , Salvador Marti i Puig Identidad, autonomia y soberania indigena en Panama y Ecuador: una mirada comparativa desde la antropologia politica, Victor Breton Solo de Zaldivar, Monica Martinez Mauri Los pueblos indigenas y la disputa por la soberania. El caso de Mexico como referencia, Marco Aparicio Wilhelmi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".