MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2200646936

Comparison of IGS and Radiosonde Determination of ZTD in the Canadian Arctic

2006· article· en· W2200646936 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Reza Ghoddousi‐Fard

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 19th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2006) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiosondeZenithMeteorologyTroposphereEnvironmental scienceGlobal Positioning SystemNumerical weather predictionGNSS applicationsData assimilationArcticGeodesyGeographyGeologyComputer scienceTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zenith Total Delay (ZTD) induced by the neutral atmosphere on GPS signals is a source of information for Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models and climate studies. Currently, the International GNSS Service (IGS) provides two types of tropospheric (neutral atmosphere) zenith path delay products: the Ultra-Rapid product with a latency of 2-3 hours and the final product with a latency of less than 4 weeks. The final IGS ZTD products are among the most accurate GPS ZTD products as they are derived from the results of all of the IGS processing centers. Although (due to the time latency) the final products may not be of use in NWP models’ data assimilation, they can be valuable data for climate studies. Furthermore, time series analysis of the GPS ZTD data may be used for spatial and temporal correlation studies. Approximately 34 months of GPS and radiosonde ZTD results for stations in and around the Canadian Arctic are compared. The results show an overall bias of 4.7 mm (GPS-RAOB) and a standard deviation of 5.8 mm which are comparable with studies carried out in other parts of the world. Long term analysis of differenced time series might help to model the error characteristic of the derived ZTD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 19th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2006)Same topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207