MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2200840682 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1410.5040

Success probability of the Babai estimators for box-constrained integer linear models

2014· preprint· en· W2200840682 on OpenAlexafffund
Jinming Wen, Xiao-Wen Chang

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2014
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaÉcole Normale Supérieure de LyonCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1Agence Nationale de la RechercheMcGill University
KeywordsInteger (computer science)Permutation (music)CombinatoricsMathematicsUpper and lower boundsDiscrete mathematicsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many applications including communications, one may encounter a linear model where the parameter vector $\hbx$ is an integer vector in a box. To estimate $\hbx$, a typical method is to solve a box-constrained integer least squares (BILS) problem. However, due to its high complexity, the box-constrained Babai integer point $\x^\sBB$ is commonly used as a suboptimal solution. In this paper, we first derive formulas for the success probability $P^\sBB$ of $\x^\sBB$ and the success probability $P^\sOB$ of the ordinary Babai integer point $\x^\sOB$ when $\hbx$ is uniformly distributed over the constraint box. Some properties of $P^\sBB$ and $P^\sOB$ and the relationship between them are studied. Then, we investigate the effects of some column permutation strategies on $¶^\sBB$. In addition to V-BLAST and SQRD, we also consider the permutation strategy involved in the LLL lattice reduction, to be referred to as LLL-P. On the one hand, we show that when the noise is relatively small, LLL-P always increases $P^\sBB$ and argue why both V-BLAST and SQRD often increase $P^\sBB$; and on the other hand, we show that when the noise is relatively large, LLL-P always decreases $P^\sBB$ and argue why both V-BLAST and SQRD often decrease $P^\sBB$. We also derive a column permutation invariant bound on $P^\sBB$, which is an upper bound and a lower bound under these two opposite conditions, respectively. Numerical results demonstrate our findings. Finally, we consider a conjecture concerning $\x^\sOB$ proposed by Ma et al. We first construct an example to show that the conjecture does not hold in general, and then show that it does hold under some conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207