Season total densities of arthropods (total and individual groups) on caged & control branches in four vertical strata
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data from a 2007 field study in the Morgan Arboretum, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec. Associated with a published paper (https://peerj.com/articles/138/). This dataset has 11 columns and 160 rows of data. Column titles: TRT = cage (caged branch) or control (no cage) Stratum = one of four vertical strata (UN = understory; LC = lower canopy; MC = mid canopy; UC = upper canopy) Rep = tree identity; 20 mature sugar maple trees were used, with control and caged branches in each stratum (i.e. 8 branches per tree) The next 8 columns contain the densities of the various groups on each branch. Note that density is provided as individuals per gram of dry leaf weight. ART = all arthropods combined Ara = spiders (Araneae) Col = beetles (Coleoptera) Der = earwigs (Dermaptera) Hem = true bugs (Hemiptera) Hym = ants, bees & wasps (Hymenoptera) Lep = caterpillars (Lepidoptera) Opi = harvestmen (Opiliones) Note that two branches contain NAs - the cages on these branches were lost during the study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".