Final analysis of intergroup randomized phase III study of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus radiation therapy (RT) in locally advanced prostate cancer (CaP) (NCIC-CTG, SWOG, MRC-UK, INT: T94-0110).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4509 Background: Data from the SPCG-7 study and interim analysis of this trial have demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit for RT when added to ADT. We present the protocol specified final analysis of PR3/PR07. Methods: Patients with locally advanced (T3/T4, N0/NX, n=1057) or organ-confined prostate cancer (T2,N0/NX, with either PSA > 40 μg/l or PSA > 20 μg/l and Gleason > 8, n=144) were randomized to lifelong ADT (bilateral orchiectomy or LHRH agonist) or ADT + RT (65-69 Gy to prostate + seminal vesicles with or without 45Gy to pelvic nodes). The primary outcome measure was OS; secondary outcomes included disease-specific survival (DSS), time to disease progression and quality of life. Final analysis was planned after 421 deaths. Results: 1,205 patients were randomized from 1995-2005, 602 to ADT alone and 603 to ADT+RT (well balanced with respect to baseline characteristics). The median follow-up is 8.0 years and 465 patients have died (260 ADT, 205 ADT+RT). Adding RT to ADT significantly reduced the risk of death (Hazard Ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.85, p=0.001). 199 patients died of disease and/or treatment (134 on ADT alone and 65 on ADT+RT). Competing risk analysis demonstrated that patients on the ADT alone arm had a significantly higher chance of dying of disease related causes than those treated with ADT+RT (10 year cumulative disease specific death rates 15% with ADT+ RT, 26% with ADT alone, p<0.0001). The addition of RT to ADT had a small detrimental effect on late gastrointestinal toxicity and health-related quality-of-life (> grade II proctitis, 0.3% ADT alone, 1.0% ADT+RT; mean change EORTC Rectal symptoms -0.3 ADT vs 1.7 ADT + RT, p=0.54). Conclusions: Mature data indicate a sustained and substantial overall survival and disease specific survival benefit for ADT+RT in the management of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer with minimal increase in late treatment toxicity. The benefits of combined modality treatment should be discussed with all patients. Supported by NCI-US Grant CA077202, CCSRI Grants #14469 and # 015469, UK Medical Research Council Grant G9805643, UK National Cancer Research Network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".