MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Ten year retrospective analysis of BOP (bleomycin, vincristine, predinisone)—A novel non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen for treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

2006· article· en· W2202753625 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew Chan, Derek Nay, Wilma Hopman, P. R. Galbraith, Tara Baetz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineRegimenFollicular lymphomaInternational Prognostic IndexVincristineRituximabPopulationGastroenterologyChemotherapySurgeryOncologyLymphomaCyclophosphamide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

17560 Background: Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) represents the most common hematological malignancy in North America. Patients with advanced NHL, particularly those with pancytopenia, often do not tolerate the myelosuppressive side effects of chemotherapy. BOP (Bleomycin 10 mg/m2 IV D1, Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (max 2 mg) D1 and Prednisone 100 mg PO on D1,3,5,) q weekly ± Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV D1 has been used as a non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced NHL at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario (CCSEO). Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of patients with NHL who have been treated with ≥1 cycle of BOP ± R at the CCSEO in the last 10 years. Primary endpoints included an assessment of patient demographics, clinical setting, clinical response, survival and toxicity. Results: Eighty-two patients were treated with BOP ± R (71 BOP, 11 R-BOP). The patient population was 59% male and 80% stage ≥3. The most common histology was Diffuse Large B cell Lymphoma (22%) and Follicular Lymphoma (19.5%). Eighty percent of patients had an IPI score ≥2. The median number of chemotherapy treatments prior to BOP was 2. Overall, the response rate (CR + PR) was 46.3% with a mean duration of response of 4.6 months. Median survival was 3.8 years. BOP was used successfully as a salvage regimen prior to stem cell transplant in three patients and as a first line treatment prior to myelosuppressive treatment in 19 patients. The regimen was generally well tolerated with no hematologic toxicity or infectious complication. Four patients experienced mild pulmonary toxicity. There were no deaths attributable to drug toxicity. Response rates and toxicities in the R-BOP population were not significantly different from those of BOP. Conclusions: Patients with advanced poor prognosis NHL have a favorable response rate associated with minimal toxicity to the non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimen BOP ± R. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→